Blagojevich (cont’d)
First, apologies to Sen. Dick Durbin. It was presumptive to say that he is a rival player in the Chicago machine. In fact, he is from the southern part of the state, and may have no connection whatsoever, past or present, with the scumbaggery in Chicago.
However, it remains to be seen what influence he may have in the filling the Senate vacancy. He still advocates a special election. Will he play a major role on choosing the candidate? Wouldn’t it be easier for Blago to step down and let the new governor complete the task?
Questions are finally emerging from the media regarding the timing and nature of Blagojevich’s “arrest”. (By the way, does anyone else find it interesting that an individual “under arrest”, especially one who holds pubic office, continues to function as if nothing happened? How come bureaucrats, civil servants, public employees, and military members are placed on “administrative leave” but elected officials can continue to exercise their authority?)
Others are now finally coming to realize that it’s becoming less likely that Fitzgerald has anything concrete on Blago aside from some taped conversations. They’re also wondering why Fitzgerald has “asked” the Obama team not to answer any questions. (Apparently, only the U.S. Attorney is allowed to leak or voice opinions on the matter.)
Recall that Fitzgerald was the Special Prosecutor in the Valerie Plame affair. Some of those who are suspicious of Obama’s innocence (such as Byron York) see this as a good thing. Others, who fear (or hope) that justice may only be selectively applied if at all, take the opposite view.
After all, it was Patrick Fitzgerald who doggedly pursued Scooter Libby on a perjury charge, while getting the real principals in the case (Colin Powell and Richard Armitage) to keep silent about its salient facts until the prosecution of Libby was completed.


